Re: Slink packages that depend on libstdc++2.8
On Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 09:36:54PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> libstdc++2.9 is the only libstdc++ in slink.
> There are still many, many packages that depend on libstdc++2.8,
> including such trifles as dpkg and apt.
> I recommend libstdc++2.8 be reuploaded into slink; there's no
> reason for it not to be there for backwards compatibility.
The proper solution is rebuilding the "libstdc++2.8 dependent" packages
with libstdc++2.9. As Guy said, without a libstdc++2.8 package in slink
the mantainers will have an "additional push" to upload a new version
of their packages.
Enrique Zanardi firstname.lastname@example.org