On Tue, Sep 29, 1998 at 09:20:06PM -0500, David Engel wrote: > I suggest the maitainer of the core packages that comprise a super > package maintain the super package as well. For example, the libc > maintainer could maintain a c-developement super package and the X > maintainer could maintain x-workstation and x-development super > packages. Sure, put more on my plate. :) Actually, I was already condsidering something very similar to this. I considered being a maverick and doing it without warning, but decided to be nice. As it stands I simply try to give the newbies a fighting chance in the new extended description of xbase. See the X Strike Force for details (new control file). > I think a section makes the most sense. BTW, does anyone have a > better name than super packages? Überpackages! -- G. Branden Robinson | Convictions are more dangerous enemies Purdue University | of truth than lies. branden@purdue.edu | -- Friedrich Nietzsche http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgp6F8mIJjES3.pgp
Description: PGP signature