Re: PAM still a goal for slink?

To: Duncan Thomson <thom-ci0@wpmail.paisley.ac.uk>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: PAM still a goal for slink?
From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 14:29:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980902142958.V22465@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] s5ed3506.077@wpmail.paisley.ac.uk>; from Duncan Thomson on Wed, Sep 02, 1998 at 12:07:03PM +0000
References: <[🔎] s5ed3506.077@wpmail.paisley.ac.uk>

To find out possible goals for slink please check

http://www.debian.org/~joey/goals/2.1/

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems.

Reply to:

References:
- PAM still a goal for slink?
  - From: Duncan Thomson <thom-ci0@wpmail.paisley.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: who's in charge of va, master ?
Next by Date: Re: DATOM cds.. and 2.0rX
Previous by thread: Re: PAM still a goal for slink?
Next by thread: new developers wait for GNUPG (was: PAM still a goal for slink)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread