Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
On Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 02:14:24PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Steve Lamb <morpheus@calweb.com> wrote:
> > "Do you have the latest release?" (2.0r2/2.0.2)
> >
> > "Yes!" (2.0)
> >
> > What part of that is not lying?
> The part in quotes is not lying. The numbers in parenthesis are
> a different issue. We should, of course, be careful to document
> what we mean by a debian release.
> The latest debian release is hamm.
> We've not released slink yet.
But if you document it (2.0.1 v. 2.0r1, v. "hamm/slink/stinky socks")
then it defeats the purpose of the basis of this whole thread, hiding what
is on the CD so the vendors can sell more copies.
> What problem are you trying to solve?
One of simple principle.
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
CC: from news not wanted or appreciated| skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reply to: