Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
On Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 01:56:56PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> You insist on talking about change as though this was a new problem that
> needed some corrective action.
No. It is an old problem that requires corrective action.
> The discussion was hashed over long ago. The decision was made.
The incorrect one, so we should do it again, and again, and again.
> No one is lying to anyone about anything, athough there is lots of
> conjecture about what is meant by this or that.
"Do you have the latest release?" (2.0r2/2.0.2)
"Yes!" (2.0)
What part of that is not lying?
> satisfied. (and don't tell me something you have already said, since it
> hasn't convinced me of anything yet)
It is because nothing will convince you.
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
CC: from news not wanted or appreciated| skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reply to: