Re: Apache Interface to SSLeay \(mod_ssl\) 2.0.2
>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca> writes:
Hamish> Is anyone considering packaging this? I would like to use
Hamish> it but don't know enough about Apache at this point.
Ben> Unfortunately, it requires patches to both ssleay AND apache,
Ben> so it's less than useful right now.
Jason> Have you checked this Ben? I looked around their stite and
Jason> it suggested the opposite but I haven't had any time to
Jason> look for sure :| (Was thinking of packaging it) Can we make
Jason> it more modular or .. ?
I have checked this, as I've compiled and used modssl.
We can make it more modular if we apply the patches it provides
to our apache and ssleay packages, but I didn't look closely
enough at the apache patches to see if they had any legal issues.
Jason> Seems to be different from that apache-ssl which was a big
Jason> ole patch to apache.
It's got a cleaner interface and is coded better, but is still not
buildable as a shared object as mod_perl is.
--
Brought to you by the letters N and Y and the number 12.
"Mmm.. incapacitating.." -- Homer Simpson
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
Reply to: