Re: All of uu.net about to be banned.
- To: Remco van de Meent <rvdmeent@xs4all.nl>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
- Cc: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>, Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: All of uu.net about to be banned.
- From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 08:51:27 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19980818085127.A30542@test.legislate.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Remco van de Meent <rvdmeent@xs4all.nl>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>, Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>, Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.02.9808181442090.9521-100000@cal052204.student.utwente.nl>; from Remco van de Meent on Tue, Aug 18, 1998 at 02:46:01PM +0200
- References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980818013850.7093J-100000@Wakko.ualberta.ca> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.02.9808181442090.9521-100000@cal052204.student.utwente.nl>
Remco van de Meent <rvdmeent@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Don't know about exim. Am told the queueing algorithms of qmail ain't that
> optimal. But when initial delivery is a success, qmail is quite good.
qmail doesn't deal well with bulk delivery across a slow serial line.
[It's optimized to minimize latency, at the expense of bandwidth.]
But that's not really an issue for murphy.
--
Raul
Reply to: