[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh

On Tue, Aug 04, 1998 at 06:33:33PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > This is an inaccurate characterization.  He favors things behaving the way
> > they have been behaving for everyone.
> Perhaps arguing about what Manoj thinks is slightly unproductive.
> > That said, I wonder if this thread on bash's [non?-]essential nature isn't
> > approaching the effort level which would have been required to analyze and
> > fix all the problems involved in re-casting it...
> You suggest we resolve any possible problems with making bash non-Essential
> before actually agreeing to do it?

Please mind your quotes. I never wrote this, Raul did.

Thank you,

"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god."        Debian GNU/Linux        finger brinkmd@ 
Marcus Brinkmann                   http://www.debian.org    master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de                        for public  PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/       PGP Key ID 36E7CD09

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: