Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
On Tue, Aug 04, 1998 at 06:33:33PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > This is an inaccurate characterization. He favors things behaving the way
> > they have been behaving for everyone.
> Perhaps arguing about what Manoj thinks is slightly unproductive.
> > That said, I wonder if this thread on bash's [non?-]essential nature isn't
> > approaching the effort level which would have been required to analyze and
> > fix all the problems involved in re-casting it...
> You suggest we resolve any possible problems with making bash non-Essential
> before actually agreeing to do it?
Please mind your quotes. I never wrote this, Raul did.
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org