Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
> This is an inaccurate characterization. He favors things behaving the way
> they have been behaving for everyone.
Perhaps arguing about what Manoj thinks is slightly unproductive.
> That said, I wonder if this thread on bash's [non?-]essential nature isn't
> approaching the effort level which would have been required to analyze and
> fix all the problems involved in re-casting it...
You suggest we resolve any possible problems with making bash non-Essential
before actually agreeing to do it?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org