Re: FHS: Wholesale conversion is wrong
- To: Richard Braakman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: FHS: Wholesale conversion is wrong
- From: Yann Dirson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 15:14:21 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <E0z1TjF-0003BE-00@night>
- References: <E0z1TjF-0003BE-00@night>
Richard Braakman writes:
> I propose the following trajectory:
> 1. Policy change: all files installed in /usr/share must be pointed
> to by symlinks not in /usr/share. (Note that this is already
> required by the FSSTND, section 6.3)
IIRC, FSSTND also mandates that no program actually refers directly to
files in /usr/share/. What shall we do about programs already
internally using /usr/share/ upstream ?
> 3. Ensure that dpkg can handle a package upgrade that moves a
> directory and replaces it with a symlink to the new location.
> Brandon Robinson ran into problems when he did this in xbase.
He's not the only one. I was hit by this with 2 packages, which ended
in `rm -rf's in preinst script to turn around this. I sent a simple
test-case in a bug-report, and got positive feedback from Ian or Klee
(don't remember), telling they were already investigating this
I'd add that both replacing a plain dir with a symlink, and replacing
a symlink with a plain dir cause problems to dpkg 1.4.0.x. Never
tried 1.4.1.x. You've been warned ;)
Yann Dirson <firstname.lastname@example.org> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
isp-email: <email@example.com> | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email: <firstname.lastname@example.org> | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org