Re: Is this expected ssh behavior?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is this expected ssh behavior?
From: lee@sectionIV.com (Lee Bradshaw)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 09:35:04 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980730093504.A6635@sectionIV.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.02.9807301211570.7261-100000@cal052204.student.utwente.nl>; from Remco van de Meent on Thu, Jul 30, 1998 at 12:12:36PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 87lnpcw9nk.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.02.9807301211570.7261-100000@cal052204.student.utwente.nl>

On Thu, Jul 30, 1998 at 12:12:36PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> On 29 Jul 1998, Rob Browning wrote:
> 
>  :   $ ssh somehost bash -c xlock
>  : 
>  : but no luck...
> 
> Does 'ssh somehost bash --login -c xlock' give better results?

No.

$ ssh freefall bash --login -c xclock
bash: xclock: command not found

-- 
Lee Bradshaw                 lee@sectionIV.com (preferred)
Alantro Communications       lee@alantro.com


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this expected ssh behavior?
  - From: Brandon Mitchell <bhmit1@mail.wm.edu>

References:
- Is this expected ssh behavior?
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: Is this expected ssh behavior?
  - From: Remco van de Meent <rvdmeent@xs4all.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: SUMMARY: pentium optimized debian discussion
Next by Date: Re: Bug#25189: ftp site reorganisation breaks production server sup port
Previous by thread: Re: Is this expected ssh behavior?
Next by thread: Re: Is this expected ssh behavior?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread