Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
On 29 Jul 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> (making it a slink requirement that any program with a reference to
> >> /usr/man also supports /usr/share/man in the same fashion, and similarly
> >> for info, and doc (dwww)).
> I would not like to see this ;-). This breaks our promise of
> incremental upgrades. We can come up with a technical solution that
> allows for a hybrid Hamm/Slink machine, and we should not take the
> lazy way out.
Did I miss something? What has been promised regarding incremental
upgrades which is broken by this?
What is a `hybrid Hamm/Slink machine'? Is it a hamm machine running
some random packages taken from slink? If so, have we promised to
support such running of slink packages in a hamm environment?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com