Re: CD README's

[Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>]

Philip Hands wrote:
> A couple of points still need to be addressed:
> 
> 1)  README.official  needs to have a description of the rules of what you're
>     allowed to distribute under the ``Official Debian 2.0 CD'' label.
> 
>     What are these ?
> 
>     Are we allowing people to do single architecture versions:
> 
>       binary-i386, contrib & source
> 
>     and call it the ``Debian 2.0 Official i386 CD set''.

> Similarly, for m68k ?

I guess so

>     and if they include all the binary-* CD's, they get to call it something 
>     like:
> 
>       Debian 2.0 Official Complete CD set

Sounds good.

>     Also, should people be allowed to distribute the binary-* CD's on their 
>     own and still call them Official, or not ?

I have no clue what you're talking about.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
*** Fatal Error: Found [MS-Windows], repartitioning Disk for Linux ...


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org