Re: CD README's
Philip Hands wrote:
> A couple of points still need to be addressed:
> 1) README.official needs to have a description of the rules of what you're
> allowed to distribute under the ``Official Debian 2.0 CD'' label.
> What are these ?
> Are we allowing people to do single architecture versions:
> binary-i386, contrib & source
> and call it the ``Debian 2.0 Official i386 CD set''.
> Similarly, for m68k ?
I guess so
> and if they include all the binary-* CD's, they get to call it something
> Debian 2.0 Official Complete CD set
> Also, should people be allowed to distribute the binary-* CD's on their
> own and still call them Official, or not ?
I have no clue what you're talking about.
*** Fatal Error: Found [MS-Windows], repartitioning Disk for Linux ...
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org