Re: "dpkg --status" not sufficient.

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, Deity Creation Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: "dpkg --status" not sufficient.
From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: 21 Jul 1998 12:46:54 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k957hzap.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu>
In-reply-to: Wichert Akkerman's message of "Tue, 21 Jul 1998 19:27:12 +0200"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980717125251.7077B-100000@Wakko.ualberta.ca> <[🔎] 87r9zfi0op.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu> <[🔎] 19980721192712.A1052@wiggy.ml.org>

Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@wiggy.ml.org> writes:

> This is beginning to sound like just what sgrep is made for. You
> might want to check that out.

True, that may be a good idea for the code to handle the selection.
We'll still need a fast way to get the text to hand to sgrep.

-- 
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930

--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: "dpkg --status" not sufficient.
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
- Re: "dpkg --status" not sufficient.
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: "dpkg --status" not sufficient.
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@wiggy.ml.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RH and GNOME
Next by Date: Re: RH and GNOME
Previous by thread: Re: "dpkg --status" not sufficient.
Next by thread: xbase fresh-install
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread