Re: Smail (was: qmail -- any alternatives and status of qmail)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Smail (was: qmail -- any alternatives and status of qmail)
From: Phil <witwerg@socket.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 09:40:52 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 35AE10F4.6DB9@socket.net>
References: <[🔎] 35ABFB87.F1D7CDA8@socket.net> <[🔎] 19980716060535.G12903@earthlink.net>

Joseph Carter wrote:
  > smail is an evil piece of crap.

So your equating it with win95? ;-)

Philip Thiem


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Smail (was: qmail -- any alternatives and status of qmail)
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>

References:
- Smail (was: qmail -- any alternatives and status of qmail)
  - From: Witwerg the Sage <witwerg@socket.net>
- Re: Smail (was: qmail -- any alternatives and status of qmail)
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Upcoming Debian 2.0 Release
Next by Date: Re: Debian i386 freeze
Previous by thread: Re: Smail (was: qmail -- any alternatives and status of qmail)
Next by thread: Re: Smail (was: qmail -- any alternatives and status of qmail)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread