[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Smail (was: qmail -- any alternatives and status of qmail)



On Tue, Jul 14, 1998 at 07:44:55PM -0500, Witwerg the Sage wrote:
> I know the sendmail is very insecure, but I was wondering about smail?
> Is it more secure, and does it support to features this some here have
> been
> asking about, but don't want to run sendmail. I've been asking around,
> but I haven't recieved a good answer yet( or I
> accidentally deleted it :-/).

smail is an evil piece of crap.  It's more likely to be secure than sendmail
is just becaise it doesn't DO most things sendmail can.  If you want to go
with something based even a little on smail, use exim---you'll be glad you
did.

Attachment: pgpTokY8QHBI6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: