Re: intent to package: licq

To: irving@pobox.com, Lalo Martins <lalo@webcom.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: intent to package: licq
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 18:29:52 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980706182952.B786@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: irving@pobox.com, Lalo Martins <lalo@webcom.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.SUN.3.96.980706134519.2680A-100000@eve.speakeasy.org>; from Larry Gilbert on Mon, Jul 06, 1998 at 02:16:02PM -0700
References: <[🔎] 19980706164339.A1234@lalo> <[🔎] Pine.SUN.3.96.980706134519.2680A-100000@eve.speakeasy.org>

Larry Gilbert <irving@pobox.com> wrote:
> Even if there is a loophole around that, there is nothing to prevent
> Mirabilis from changing their servers and software to lock out
> third-party software.

No installed base to speak of?

I wonder if the european law to the effect that anyone can
reverse-engineer a communications protocol they're using, by examining
the traffic, applies here?

-- 
Raul

--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: intent to package: licq
  - From: Larry Gilbert <irving@pobox.com>
- Re: intent to package: licq
  - From: Anselm Lingnau <lingnau@tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de>

References:
- intent to package: licq
  - From: Lalo Martins <lalo@webcom.com>
- Re: intent to package: licq
  - From: Larry Gilbert <irving@pobox.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian, clusters, Beowulf and similar
Next by Date: Re: .so and .a libs, tcl, postgres = in over my head
Previous by thread: Re: intent to package: licq
Next by thread: Re: intent to package: licq
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread