Re: Base Set: Suggested additions & removals.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Base Set: Suggested additions & removals.
From: Michael Dietrich <mdt@mdt.in-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 01:38:18 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980608013818.J1006@mdt.in-berlin.de>
Reply-to: mdt@mdt.in-berlin.de
In-reply-to: <[🔎] dmmhg1wamk9.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>; from James Troup on Sun, Jun 07, 1998 at 11:12:22PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 87ra1050iy.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com> <[🔎] dmmhg1wamk9.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>

> >  I would like to have `mc' and the two packages it depends on placed
> >  into the base set.
> I think this is a horrendously bad idea.
agreed
-- 
see header


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Base Set: Suggested additions & removals.
  - From: karlheg@inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)
- Re: Base Set: Suggested additions & removals.
  - From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Documentation/License freeness
Next by Date: Re: Zip disk install set?
Previous by thread: Re: Base Set: Suggested additions & removals.
Next by thread: Re: Base Set: Suggested additions & removals.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread