Re: so what? Re: Debian development modem
On Sun, May 31, 1998 at 11:32:45AM -0700, Guy Maor wrote:
> Not removed, just left in unstable. Is that undesirable?
> I think this is better than your proposal of splitting Debian into
> core and non-core parts, and only releasing stable versions of core.
This discussion has been getting away from the original issue that I
brought up -- the need to make more frequent releases. I am going to
get back to that in the new thread started by Raul Miller with subject
"Debian Re-organization proposals". Before doing that though, I need
to correct the misunderstanding above.
I never proposed only releasing stable versions or core packages. In
fact, I am in favor of including all packages that meet the DSFG on
release CDs, but that the distinction between core and non-core (and
all that it implies) be clearer than it currently is.
David Engel ODS Networks
firstname.lastname@example.org 1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400 Richardson, TX 75081
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org