Re: another look at release-critical bugs

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: another look at release-critical bugs
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 20:49:47 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980529204947.K3613@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199805290915.DAA07655@chunks.gag.com>; from Bdale Garbee on Fri, May 29, 1998 at 03:15:55AM -0600
References: <[🔎] 199805290915.DAA07655@chunks.gag.com>

Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> wrote:
> Bubs in 'standard' packages:
> lpr               22837  lpd dies without trace (severe!) [0]  (Adam Klein <aklein@debian.org>)

If this can't be fixed easily, perhaps we ought to promote lprng to
standard and demote lpr to optional. Yes, I know that bug-for-bug
compatability is a nice thing, but in my experience lprng is superior to
lpr.

-- 
Raul

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: another look at release-critical bugs
  - From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
- Re: another look at release-critical bugs: lpr
  - From: Jay Wardle <JAYWARDLE@prodigy.net>

References:
- another look at release-critical bugs
  - From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>

Prev by Date: Re: rsh and rcp, or ftp stalling
Next by Date: Re: rsh and rcp, or ftp stalling
Previous by thread: Re: another look at release-critical bugs
Next by thread: Re: another look at release-critical bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread