Re: another look at release-critical bugs: lpr
Raul Miller wrote:
> Bdale Garbee <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Bubs in 'standard' packages:
> > lpr 22837 lpd dies without trace (severe!)  (Adam Klein <firstname.lastname@example.org>)
> If this can't be fixed easily, perhaps we ought to promote lprng to
> standard and demote lpr to optional. Yes, I know that bug-for-bug
> compatability is a nice thing, but in my experience lprng is superior to
In my (admittedly limited) experience, lpr is superior to lprng.
Both a friend and I could not get lprng setup on our systems.
It requires a lot of configuration work. We had both spent a
significant amount of time with lprng, and lpr was a snap.
lpr is clearly the best choice for most of the small system users.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org