Re: Packages to be removed from hamm

To: David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
From: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 14:19:08 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 356EFC1C.8A596E8@verisim.com>
References: <[🔎] 19980529102230.49790@heorot> <[🔎] 356EF88B.2E6E91C2@verisim.com> <[🔎] 19980529110548.10587@heorot>

> > Why?  Neither has any dependancy on ircii or tkirc.
> 
> They are both based on ircII code.

Neither have any bugs reported against them stating that they should not
be allowed.  That's all I have to go on.

                                          Brian
                                 ( bcwhite@verisim.com )

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Management should work for the engineers, not the other way around.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@tapiola.Infodrom.North.DE>

References:
- Packages to be removed from hamm
  - From: David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com>
- Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
  - From: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>
- Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
  - From: David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
Next by Date: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
Previous by thread: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
Next by thread: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread