Re: Packages to be removed from hamm

To: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
From: David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 11:05:48 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980529110548.10587@heorot>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 356EF88B.2E6E91C2@verisim.com>; from Brian White on Fri, May 29, 1998 at 02:03:55PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 19980529102230.49790@heorot> <[🔎] 356EF88B.2E6E91C2@verisim.com>

On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 02:03:55PM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > ircii             21683  ircii: ircii is non-free! [26]  (Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@debian.org>)
> > tkirc                    depends on ircii
> > 
> > In addition to these two packages, bitchx and epic should also be
> > removed.
> 
> Why?  Neither has any dependancy on ircii or tkirc.

They are both based on ircII code.

Thanks,
-- 
David Welton                          http://www.efn.org/~davidw 

	Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
  - From: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>

References:
- Packages to be removed from hamm
  - From: David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com>
- Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
  - From: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
Next by Date: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
Previous by thread: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
Next by thread: Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread