Re: Drop DFSG in favour of OSD?
- To: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>, Will Lowe <harpo@udel.edu>
- Cc: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>, Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>, Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Drop DFSG in favour of OSD?
- From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@feedback.net.ar>
- Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 22:35:05 -0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19980524223505.A510@feedback.net.ar>
- Mail-followup-to: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>, Will Lowe <harpo@udel.edu>, Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>, Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>, Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980524135521.965E-100000@dwarf.polaris.net>; from Dale Scheetz on Sun, May 24, 1998 at 02:03:58PM -0400
- References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.95q.980524123235.252B-100000@gondolin> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980524135521.965E-100000@dwarf.polaris.net>
> Whether Open Source "really takes off" or not is really not the issue. The
> issue is, how close are the two guidelines going to be in the future? It
> must be understood that the two "standards" are different in fundamental
> goals. The Open Source movement is a commercial one, Debian is not. That
> distinction alone should keep these two documents seperate.
Yes. And we shouldn't use the new name `open source' and call the DFSG
"DOSG". Debian is about freedom and the word free fits very well, we have
nothing to hide or to `make up'...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: