Re: Removal of Packages from Hamm (!)

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>
Cc: tetex-base@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Removal of Packages from Hamm (!)
From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 19:55:37 +0200 (MESZ)
Message-id: <[🔎] 13672.24173.254922.945853@evinrude.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
In-reply-to: <356591E5.3BDD586A@verisim.com>
References: <356591E5.3BDD586A@verisim.com>

These bugs are resolved now. So no need to worry.

Christoph

Brian White writes:
 > 
 > tetex-base        22680  tetex-base: doesn't configure [0]  (Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>)
 > tetex-base        22694  tetex-base: Postinst fails [0]  (Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>)
 > tetex-base        22728  tetex-base i upgrade glitch [0]  (Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal and call for participation, Linux Standard Base Project
Next by Date: Re: virtual package for apache required?
Previous by thread: Re: Removal of Packages from Hamm (!)
Next by thread: Drop DFSG in favour of OSD?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread