Re: Open Source-ness of ircII

To: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Robert Woodcock <rcw@oz.net>, Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Open Source-ness of ircII
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 00:04:19 +1000
Message-id: <26224.896018659@eterna.com.au>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 24 May 1998 11:19:19 +0100." <Pine.SOL.3.95q.980524111754.3583F-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk>

   This is unfortunate.  I suspect maybe we should move it into non-free,
   although that's only my opinion.  Ideally we'd want an unencumbered
   rewrite (yagirc looks promising but buggy, although it's graphical of
   course).

yeah, i know.  i've wanted to change the wording of that for a long
time but ... 
   
   P.S. Hmm.. name rings a bell.  Were you a NetBSD kernel hacker, mrg?


still am  :-)


.mrg.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Open Source-ness of ircII
  - From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian from the Stampede's POV
Next by Date: Re: Drop DFSG in favour of OSD?
Previous by thread: Re: Open Source-ness of ircII
Next by thread: Re: Open Source-ness of ircII
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread