Re: New APT version
Brandon Mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> [ debate of autoup or apt for the bo->hamm upgrade ]
> I think it's time for me to chime in. Apt looks very promising,
> especially with the bo version that exists. I've been pleased with it's
> use over the past few days. As one of the heads of the testing group,
> I've asked that it be one of our priorities before letting hamm out the
> However, I'd hate to see autoup go to waste. What about making one last
> version of autoup.sh and include a tar ball of the needed package files?
> This gives us another option and something stable to test and verify it's
> If there are no major unfixed problems with apt at release time, I feel
> this is what the testing group will recommend as a prefered upgrade
> Does anyone have any problems with this?
Does autoup work on m68k, sparc, powerpc, ... ?
apt does (at least for m68k and powerpc).
May the Source be with you.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org