[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New APT version

Brandon Mitchell <bhmit1@mail.wm.edu> writes:

> [ debate of autoup or apt for the bo->hamm upgrade ]
> I think it's time for me to chime in.  Apt looks very promising,
> especially with the bo version that exists.  I've been pleased with it's
> use over the past few days.  As one of the heads of the testing group,
> I've asked that it be one of our priorities before letting hamm out the
> door.  
> However, I'd hate to see autoup go to waste.  What about making one last
> version of autoup.sh and include a tar ball of the needed package files?
> This gives us another option and something stable to test and verify it's
> abilities.  
> If there are no major unfixed problems with apt at release time, I feel
> this is what the testing group will recommend as a prefered upgrade
> method.  
> Does anyone have any problems with this?

Does autoup work on m68k, sparc, powerpc, ... ?

apt does (at least for m68k and powerpc).

May the Source be with you.

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: