Re: New APT version
On 20 May 1998, Brederlow wrote:
> Brandon Mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > [ debate of autoup or apt for the bo->hamm upgrade ]
> > [ my solution, keep autoup with a tarball of the necessary packages,
> > and use apt as the recommended solution ]
> > Does anyone have any problems with this?
> Does autoup work on m68k, sparc, powerpc, ... ?
Is this a reason not to keep apt?
If so, I fail to see why. We have a perfectly good alternative that works
for some people, so I think it should be made available. If you would
like, specify that it's an i386 specific solution. As for official
support, these platforms didn't have a stable bo released for them. If
they are running a libc5 hamm that you mentioned, then they are running an
If not, and you were just asking an honest question, then I don't know the
answer. I only follow x86. I don't know if the testing group even has
the resources to try it (we are happy to get an x86 laptop).
Brandon Mitchell <email@example.com> "We all know linux is great... it
PGP: finger -l firstname.lastname@example.org does infinite loops in 5 seconds"
Phone: (757) 596-5550 --Linus Torvalds
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org