Re: Debian Bug#20445 disagree
> > > In this case, if somebody has the knowledge to build their own 2.1 kernel
> > > (since one didn't come on the CD), then they have the knowledge necessary
> > > to get packages from "unstable".
> > It's very unpleasant to have to download things whn you have just bought a
> > CD. And many users are forced to use new kernels because of their new
> > hardware drivers.
> > These package are already a working feature of hamm... why would we remove
> > it?
> The 2.1 kernel is not part of Hamm and so these packages are _not_ a working
> feature of Hamm.
I wouldn't say that "ready for 2.1 kernels" isn't a desirable feature...
Debian 2.0 stable will be here for a while and remember that 2.1.x kernels
are starting some kind of code freeze time...
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org