Re: Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?

To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
Cc: "debian-devel@lists.debian.org" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?
From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1998 14:26:56 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 35291E70.4C4D3AE0@livenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 87g1jr25g8.fsf@donut.mit.edu> <[🔎] 35283E7B.1267034E@livenet.net> <[🔎] 877m53qwm8.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>

My point was that on a partition crash where etc is lost any symlinks to
alternatives would also die.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?
  - From: "David Z. Maze" <dmaze@donut.mit.edu>
- Re: Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
- Re: Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5)
Next by Date: Re: Beta Netscape Communicator4 debs are out!
Previous by thread: Re: Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?
Next by thread: Re: Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread