Re: Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?
"David Z. Maze" <dmaze@donut.mit.edu> writes:
> At least two packages (ash and bash) provide a program that could
> reasonably masquerade as /bin/sh. Is there a {historical,good} reason
> why this isn't managed with Debian's alternatives mechanism?
See bug report 10699, in which I wrote:
After 2.0 is released, I will make /bin/sh an alternative that bash
and ash can provide. I don't want to do it before then because it
might be too unsettling.
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: