Re: Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?
In article <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.95q.980406124057.4089B-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk> you wrote:
> For your information, should you ever need to do this, what you do is have
> a skeleton /etc on the root partition, which is eventually masked when
> mountall is called.
> Can't think of any good reasons for this (other than really chronic
> mis-partitioning maladies)
Or a readonly root partition which might be a good thing (TM).
--
Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: