Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5.1)
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Ian> If might be a good idea to explicitly allow the developers to
Ian> override the committee with a 2:1 supermajority, since they can
Ian> achieve the same effect by amending the constitution.
Ian> I've also been wondering if 2:1 is too low a supermajority for
Ian> constitutional amendments.
Ian> Does anyone else have any thoughts ? I haven't included any
Ian> changes to this area in my most recent draft.
Hmmm. How about a 2:1 super majority to over ride the
Technical Committee, as we have now, but a 3:1 requirtement to amend
the constituition, once it is accepted?
"Nothing, not love, not greed, not passion or hatred, is stronger
than a writer's need to change another writer's copy." Arthur Evans
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com