Formal amendment to the proposed Constituition
Hi,
I wish to propose A Formal Amendment to the Proposed
constituition.
______________________________________________________________________
1 A) Move to remove clause 4.1.3
2----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 3. Override any decision by the Project Leader or a Delegate.
4----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 And replace it by:
6
7----------------------------------------------------------------------
8 3. Override any decision by the Project Leader, Technical
9 Committee or a Delegate.
10----------------------------------------------------------------------
11
12 B) Replace 4.2.2 and 4.2.2.1
13 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
14 2. Delaying a decision by the Project Leader or their Delegate:
15 1. If the Project Leader or their Delegate has made a decision,
16 then Developers can override them by passing a resolution to
17 do so; see s4.1(3).
18 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
19 And replace it by:
20 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
21 2. Delaying a decision by the Project Leader, Technical
22 Committee or their Delegate:
23 1. If the Project Leader, Technical Committee or their
24 Delegate has made a decision, then Developers can
25 override them by passing a resolution to do so; see
26 s4.1(3).
27 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
28
29 C) Replace Section 6.1.4
30----------------------------------------------------------------------
31 4. Overrule a developer (requires a 3:1 majority).
32 The Technical Committee may ask a developer to take a particular
33 technical course of action even if the developer does not wish to;
34 this requires a 3:1 majority. For example, the Committee may
35 determine that a complaint made by the submitter of a bug is
36 justified and that the submitter's proposed solution should be
37 implemented.
38----------------------------------------------------------------------
39
40 And replace it by
41----------------------------------------------------------------------
42 4. Overrule a developer (requires a 3:1 majority in a vote by the
43 Technical Committee). The Technical Committee may ask a
44 developer to take a particular technical course of action even
45 if the developer does not wish to; this requires a 3:1 majority
46 of all the Technical Committee members currently seated. For
47 example, the Committee may determine that a complaint made by
48 the submitter of a bug is justified and that the submitter's
49 proposed solution should be implemented.
50----------------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________
manoj
--
It is important to note that probably no large operating system using
current design technology can withstand a determined and
well-coordinated attack, and that most such documented penetrations
have been remarkably easy. Hebbard, "A Penetration Analysis of the
Michigan Terminal System", Operating Systems Review, Vol. 14, No. 1,
June 1980, pp. 7-20
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: