Re: proposed constitution and NEW: proposed voting procedure
bleach@bellsouth.net (Bill Leach) wrote on 29.03.98 in <[🔎] 351EB91D.36295D8C@bellsouth.net>:
> I suppose that I need to read the full text of the proposed constitution
> but...
You do.
> This idea 'deciding' the vote early sounds pretty shaky as well as
> subject to easy abuse.
How so? In most votes, there is a point where the result can no longer be
changed. What's shaky about that? Where is abuse possible?
> OTOH, there are doubtless many 'issues' that are NOT hot subjects for
> many developers and basically would be voted upon (almost immediately)
> by only those with a direct concern about the issue. In which case such
> 'concenses' voting process is probably good.
But that won't work. If most developers don't vote, you cannot be sure of
the result until the deadline.
> Does the constitution allow for rigorous voting requirements for such
> things as modification of the constitution itself or voting for officers
> of the organization?
Why don't you _read_ it?
MfG Kai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: