Re: scwm

[Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>]

lynbech@daimi.aau.dk (Christian Lynbech on satellite) writes:

> However, I see one snag.
> 
> The scwm maintainers seems, allthough reluctantly, to give up
> supporting guile 1.2, the last proper release of guile. And the last
> release of scwm (0.6) is much better than 0.5, especially in icon
> support.
> 
> I do not know how debian's guile package handles the released
> vs. snapshots situation, but if it is that the guile package only
> represent the proper releases of guile, it could be a problem to keep
> up with the development of scwm.

I think the solution here would be to have guile1.2 packages and
guileX.X where X.X is the unstable version.  Same for scwm if there's
any reason to provide the stable version.  Then scwm unstable can
depend on guileX.X.

-- 
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94  53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org