[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Intent to package `awk'



On Sun, Mar 29, 1998 at 01:39:44PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I intent to package a program called "awk", which I downloaded from Brian
> Kernighan's home page :-)
[...]

> Copyright follows:
> /****************************************************************
> Copyright (C) Lucent Technologies 1997
> All Rights Reserved
> 
> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and
> its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby
> granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all
> copies and that both that the copyright notice and this
> permission notice and warranty disclaimer appear in supporting
> documentation, and that the name Lucent Technologies or any of
> its entities not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining
> to distribution of the software without specific, written prior
> permission.
> 
> LUCENT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE,
> [ snipped standard disclaimer about lack of warranty etc. ]
> 
> Questions:
> 
> 1) Is this DFSG-compliant?

I would say yes: looks like standard BSD license (huh, AT&T and BSD license?)

> 2) How should we name it? awk is already a generic name which is handled 
> via the alternatives mechanism. I suppose it should be something like
> /usr/bin/tota "The One True Awk"... or /usr/bin/the-one-true-awk
> Suggestions?

oawk, if it's really the old awk, otherwise nawk if it's the new one
(This is SunOS [~ SVR4] naming)

David


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: