Re: teTeX non-Free
Richard Kaszeta writes:
> Olaf Weber writes ("Re: teTeX non-Free"):
>> Also multicol.sty (in texmf/tex/latex/tools). We (that is, Thomas
>> Esser and the other people working on teTeX) need a volunteer to sort
>> these issues out, so that the non-free tree can separated out.
>> As you point out, a fair number of packages require distribution of
>> their source files (.dtx and .ins), which is easy to do. A complete
>> list of those would also be welcome.
> Well, I'll step up to the plate on this one.
That's excellent news (note the CC list). For this work to be most
useful, it will have to be done for the 0.9 pretest, which can be
found at <ftp.informatik.uni-hannover.de:/home/te/private/.0.9>,
rather than the 0.4 version. (Although 0.4 is already a good starting
point.)
> I'm about halfway through identifying the copyright and license of
> each package and font included in teTeX (Steve Dunham,
> dunham@cps.msu.edu, has already done this for the programs in
> teTeX),
Can you send me the results?
> and when I finish this (tomorrow probably) I will sort them into
> "DSFG-compliant", "DFSG-non-compliant", and "questionable", and also
> note particular distribution restrictions like requiring source
> packages, renaming, or whatever.
--
Olaf Weber
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: