Re^4: Are we in this for ourselves?
Am 19.03.98 schrieb pseelig # goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de ...
Moin Paul!
PS> actually. Redhat seems to be favoured by authors of famous German
PS> Linux books like the one from Michael Kofler.
You#re right, but CDs included in books are nearly always out of date.
PS> No, there is no missing democratic decision. I really don't even want
PS> to bother about things like a logo or a package management tool's
But other do.
PS> name. This is just useful for slowing down Debian's development
PS> impetus and i really don't even want democratic participation with
This is not a time problem, for example we could install a WWW vote system
for policy changes.
And I think that the missing democracy slows down the development. A lot
of discussions in this list produce no results.
PS> want to contribute the packages i do like to use with a good Linux
Ok, but than you#ve no possibility to improve the concept itself.
PS> Possibly too much democratic slow downs? ;-)
I never saw a discussion about the code freeze date!
cu, Marco
--
Uni: Budde@tu-harburg.de Fido: 2:240/5202.15
Mailbox: mbudde@hqsys.antar.com http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: