Providing a static e2fsck ?
Gregory pointed out some days ago that a e2fsck would be useful to
have, to allow for recovery in case of a bad crash.
The problem is how to achieve that. Here are the points I thought
about:
* the shared e2fsck could probably be dropped from the package, but
I'd like to hear opinions about that.
* the static e2fsck is too large (261472 compared to 62564) to be
installed on the boot disks, and it won't serve anything to have it
static here.
A solution would be to keep the current e2fsprogs package as is (a
split is already planned to spare space on boot disks), and provide an
additionnal "e2fsck-static" package, with a high priority (Required ?).
Any opinions out there ?
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@a2points.com> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
alt-email: <dirson@univ-mlv.fr> | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email: <dirson@debian.org> | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: