Re: Planning new virtual packages for hamm
> > I'm not really informed enough about these packages to make judgements
> > on this. Wanting to be able to interchange other libraries is a good
> > arguement for the split. It may be possible to include other libraries
> > into the existing monolithic package, much as (I believe) netbase includes
> > many little packages in one.
>
> I'm not really sure I understand what you're saying here... could you
> please reword ?
I was trying to say that you could pick up the libraries from a different
source and still include them in the same (eg. e2fsprogs) package.
Brian
( bcwhite@verisim.com )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian GNU/Linux! Search it at http://insite.verisim.com/search/debian/simple
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: