Re: ps -aux Vs ps aux
On Feb 23, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> So we have a problem here. I have forwarded a bug complaining about this
> to the upstream guys to get their comments, but what should Debian do?
> On the one hand, we have the standard Unix practice, on the other we have
> the standard procps behavour.
> If we decide to revert to standard Unix bahavour, what do we do about these
> upcoming Unix98 options?
I believe the Unix98 options are a superset of the SysV-style options, which
would be covered under your (2) above (now removed).
Basically, what this means is that 'ps -[opts]' will act like a SysV ps
does (with any Unix98 extensions), and 'ps [opts]' will act like a BSD ps
| Chris Lawrence | The Realistic Consolidation Proposal |
| <email@example.com> | http://newforesthills.base.org/regional.html |
| | |
| Sr Political Science Major | Join the party that opposed the CDA |
| University of Memphis | http://www.lp.org/ |
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .