ps -aux Vs ps aux
The latest procps 1.26 is essentially the same as the procps you ftp off
say, sunsite, only it is a lot easier to install!
1) It doesn't have colour support
2) It doesn't have POSIX (ps -efg) support
3) It doesn't like '-'s any more, by default.
1) we've talked about already, so colour is gone, 2) is a shame, but the
upstream guys tell me it will be in soon.
Now the vexed question about 3).
What does it look like?
scooter$ ps -a
warning: `-' deprecated; use `ps a', not `ps -a'
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
222 2 SW 0:00 (getty)
That warning is the problem. The reason the warning is there is spelt out in
the man pages.
The command-line arguments should not be preceeded by a
`-' character, because in the future, a `-' will be used
to indicate Unix98-standard command-line arguments, while
no `-' will indicate the current ``extended BSD'' style of
command line arguments.
So we have a problem here. I have forwarded a bug complaining about this
to the upstream guys to get their comments, but what should Debian do?
On the one hand, we have the standard Unix practice, on the other we have
the standard procps behavour.
If we decide to revert to standard Unix bahavour, what do we do about these
upcoming Unix98 options?
Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90
|@work: firstname.lastname@example.org, @play: email@example.com|
|@home: firstname.lastname@example.org, @debian:email@example.com|
Finger firstname.lastname@example.org for PGP key, http://www.triode.net.au/~csmall
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .