Re: ps -aux Vs ps aux

To: Chris Lawrence <quango@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ps -aux Vs ps aux
From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com>
Date: 23 Feb 1998 10:10:20 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87wwemur8z.fsf@wsuse5.mckesson.com>
In-reply-to: Chris Lawrence's message of "Mon, 23 Feb 1998 00:33:18 -0600"
References: <[🔎] 199802222158.IAA19347@scooter.o.i.net> <[🔎] 19980223003318.16817@mem-tn1-18>

>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Lawrence <quango@ix.netcom.com> writes:
    Chris> Basically, what this means is that 'ps -[opts]' will act
    Chris> like a SysV ps does (with any Unix98 extensions), and 'ps
    Chris> [opts]' will act like a BSD ps does.

Cool! Just like AIX (only backwards :))

-- 
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ps -aux Vs ps aux
  - From: Richard L Shepherd <richards@waikato.ac.nz>

References:
- ps -aux Vs ps aux
  - From: csmall@scooter.o.i.net
- Re: ps -aux Vs ps aux
  - From: Chris Lawrence <quango@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: policy violation and bug reports.
Next by Date: Re: FREEZING HAMM (!)
Previous by thread: Re: ps -aux Vs ps aux
Next by thread: Re: ps -aux Vs ps aux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread