Re: updated lintian reports
- To: Debian Development <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: updated lintian reports
- From: Christian Schwarz <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:01:46 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980212100010.5555F-100000@monet>
- In-reply-to: <19980211161106.49139@kite>
On Wed, 11 Feb 1998, Joey Hess wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Also, I have a question about overrides.
> > Should we perhaps arrange it so that overridden problems get audited
> > periodically? I can think of two scenarios where this would be useful:
> > I don't know exactly how linitan works, but if it defaults to silent
> > operation when there are no non-overridden warnings or errors, perhaps
> Maybe lintian could have an "O:" level of output (like "E:" and "W:") added,
> for overrides.
This sounds like a good idea!
I'll change lintian so that `overridden' errors/warnings are displayed
with "O:", but only if the `-v' (verbose) option is specified. In
addition, I'll change the reporting tool so that these overridden messages
are also displayed on the web page (together with a prominent note, that
these messages are not considered as warning/error for the package).
-- Christian Schwarz
PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
CS Software goes online! Visit our new home page at
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .