Re: ppp's ip-{up,down} and possible utilization of 'run-parts'
> So do I. I first asked Christoph for this back in the spring, and I've since
> asked Phil Hands about it when he took over the package and I've seen nothing
> happen yet..
It's on my TODO list. I was intending to release a package including this
this evening, but I've just wasted a couple of hours trying to get MSCHAP to
do something useful :-( (BTW has anyone got this stuff working ?).
Anyway, I may have chance to do something about it tomorrow.
On a related topic:
I thought I'd call the PAM-free ppp package ppp-base, like perl-base.
I'm still not sure about the best way to do this though. It looks like the
only thing that needs to be different is the pppd binary, so:
Should I make ppp contain only the pppd with PAM binary, and have it depend on
ppp-base (which would contain most of the rest of ppp), and use alternates on
pppd ?
Cheers, Phil.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: