Re: bo-updates packages
On Sat, Dec 06, 1997 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
> Most maintainers have a double boot machine (like me), or have a bo
> machine on their net, and launching recompilation of latest packages
> (after a small change in the changelog file) is a little waste of time
> (and gives more benefits).
> I remember of one developer who couldn't upgrade his only machine to
> hamm; he could only help doing non-maintainer uploads of new packages.
>
> Pay attention: nobody here is proposing to create a debian-1.4 libc5
> based release! That would be a waste of energies. Only new packages and
> security fixes should be libc5-recompiled, not everything.
You've won me over. I've backported a couple of my packages,
but only one (guavac) is not new for hamm, or even vaguely well known.
However I think that fixing bugs in hamm should probably take priority,
but I don't have outstanding here.
hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: