Re: bo-updates packages
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> You've won me over. I've backported a couple of my packages,
> but only one (guavac) is not new for hamm, or even vaguely well known.
> However I think that fixing bugs in hamm should probably take
> priority, but I don't have outstanding here.
Right. It's only a recompilation. If one package doesn't work we don't
It's only a kind offer to our bo users instead of harshly say "get the
source from hamm and recompile yourself!". No more.
Therefore should be done only for new or improved packages (both from
upstream than bugs fixing).
| firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
| Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .