[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Duplicate messages on this list



Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> 
>         Personally, I still think that reply-to is a bad solution; 

I agree.

>         The people with sad mail software and lazy fingers are
>  penalizing the people with low bandwidth. Don't break conforming
>  software to cater to broken software.

Are we sure that we giving the right answers to Gonzalo's problem?

I received his post about "Re: linux/unix to NT" twice (only his):

one had the headers:

Received: (from list@localhost) by templinux.bucknell.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5)
          id VAA07482; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 21:19:26 -0500
Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 21:19:26 -0500
Date:  Tue, 2 Dec 1997 18:13:06 -0300
Message-Id:  <199712022113.SAA01886@newton.nowhere.cl>
Resent-Message-ID:   <"y-M46C.A.OzB.lGMh0"@templinux>
X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/513

while the other:

Received:  (from gonzo@localhost) by newton.nowhere.cl (8.8.5/8.8.5) 
           id SAA01886; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 18:13:06 -0300
Resent-Date:  3 Dec 1997 02:12:33 -0000
Date:  Tue, 2 Dec 1997 18:13:06 -0300
Message-Id:  <199712022113.SAA01886@newton.nowhere.cl>
Resent-Message-ID:  <"V_NgkD.A.M7B.RAMh0"@debian>
X-Mailing-List:  <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/11843


That messages took two different paths and were distributed by two
different servers (is templinux.bucknell.edu our list backup or is a
NNTP/SMTP gateway ? )
Has Gonzalo a newsfeed serving debian-devel?


fabrizio
-- 
| fpolacco@icenet.fi    fpolacco@debian.org    fpolacco@pluto.linux.it
| Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
> Just because Red Hat do it doesn't mean it's a good idea. [Ian J.]



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: