Re: Debian 2.0 compilation effort
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:
> Steve Dunham <dunham@cps.msu.edu> writes:
>
> > It would be nice to get a polished glibc release out the door, then
> > work on a 2.1 that adds fully integrated PAM support, diety, and
> > various other goodies.
> Please no! Keep PAM out of this!
As long as it comes with the correct default configuration, the change
should be unnoticable to people who don't mess with the configuration
files.
> I have had nothing but bad experiences with it on RedHat. Please do
> not doom us to the same fate...
Hmm, I've had wonderful experiences with it. I love being able to
adjust the semantics of authentication without recompiling everything
(like disabling the securetty stuff). It's definitely on my list of
Debian shortcomings.
> That said, PAM seems like a good idea but doesn't seem to work.
What is it doing wrong?
Steve
dunham@cps.msu.edu
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: