Re: Debian 2.0 compilation effort
John Goerzen <email@example.com> writes:
> Steve Dunham <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > It would be nice to get a polished glibc release out the door, then
> > work on a 2.1 that adds fully integrated PAM support, diety, and
> > various other goodies.
> Please no! Keep PAM out of this!
As long as it comes with the correct default configuration, the change
should be unnoticable to people who don't mess with the configuration
> I have had nothing but bad experiences with it on RedHat. Please do
> not doom us to the same fate...
Hmm, I've had wonderful experiences with it. I love being able to
adjust the semantics of authentication without recompiling everything
(like disabling the securetty stuff). It's definitely on my list of
> That said, PAM seems like a good idea but doesn't seem to work.
What is it doing wrong?
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .